Much has been made about the extent to which Canada's political discourse has been polarized these days, particularly embodied by the two leading figures now battling for control of our country's future direction, Justin Trudeau on the left and now Pierre Poilievre on the right.
Excellent view Angelo and I couldn't agree with you more on this last statement:
"Therefore, it would only be prudent for the party to ponder whether it would be better served with a new leader capable of reorienting the Liberals back to its traditional centrists roots, where most Canadians are waiting to see a return of any party daring to call itself a “natural governing” one, in a climate of escalating polarization."
I think this is a very well-thought-out and well-written article. It is clear that the author is knowledgeable about Canadian politics and has strong opinions on the current state of affairs. I agree with the author that the Liberals have abandoned their traditional approach to governance and that this has led to a more polarized political environment. I also agree that the Conservatives under Poilievre are not offering any real solutions to the problems facing the country. I think the author makes a valid point that the Liberals need to introspect and consider whether Justin Trudeau is still the best leader for the party.
"Poilievre has been no better, having been disturbingly silent on Bill 96 and Smith's Sovereignty Act, not to mention a general lightness on detailed policy prescriptions"
It seems like a trend these days both in Canada and the US. Emphasis on brand and marketing, light on implementation details. An effective strategy in todays influencer culture? Will be interesting to see how it plays out.
Whats wrong with Bill 96? The Quebecers have a strong sense of identity and are legally entitled by treaty to maintain their French cultural identity. It's overwhelmingly popular there too (over 80% support).
The English are known to not honour treaties ... I'm glad the French Canadians continue to keep them honest.
There is nothing wrong with Bill 96 per se. However, its implementation could be better. For example, the bill does not address the issue of language immersion programs in Quebec's schools.
Great review Angelo. Looking forward to many more.
Excellent view Angelo and I couldn't agree with you more on this last statement:
"Therefore, it would only be prudent for the party to ponder whether it would be better served with a new leader capable of reorienting the Liberals back to its traditional centrists roots, where most Canadians are waiting to see a return of any party daring to call itself a “natural governing” one, in a climate of escalating polarization."
I think this is a very well-thought-out and well-written article. It is clear that the author is knowledgeable about Canadian politics and has strong opinions on the current state of affairs. I agree with the author that the Liberals have abandoned their traditional approach to governance and that this has led to a more polarized political environment. I also agree that the Conservatives under Poilievre are not offering any real solutions to the problems facing the country. I think the author makes a valid point that the Liberals need to introspect and consider whether Justin Trudeau is still the best leader for the party.
The first of many newsletters! All the best in this new and exciting endeavor 😀
"Poilievre has been no better, having been disturbingly silent on Bill 96 and Smith's Sovereignty Act, not to mention a general lightness on detailed policy prescriptions"
It seems like a trend these days both in Canada and the US. Emphasis on brand and marketing, light on implementation details. An effective strategy in todays influencer culture? Will be interesting to see how it plays out.
Whats wrong with Bill 96? The Quebecers have a strong sense of identity and are legally entitled by treaty to maintain their French cultural identity. It's overwhelmingly popular there too (over 80% support).
The English are known to not honour treaties ... I'm glad the French Canadians continue to keep them honest.
There is nothing wrong with Bill 96 per se. However, its implementation could be better. For example, the bill does not address the issue of language immersion programs in Quebec's schools.